Do you know where the "blacklist" phrase comes from? Dates back in the times of the restoration of the British monarchy. In their spread of the throne in front of 1660. Charles II disposes of being punished all responsible for the execution of his father Charles I. The monarch issues the order with the arrangement, "If someone innocent falls into this black list," not to be offended, but to "think about whether the wrong principle or interest did not lead him to that. " This writes in its analysis "
Yes, only American persons, because for other countries, these sanctions do not apply and do not apply accordingly. Moreover, Bulgaria - but apparently only on paper, because there is nothing European, democratically or legally in the actions of the office cabinet.

On Wednesday, the first meeting of the Commission's temporary Committee was held in Parliament. On him, Minister Vassilev compared the sanctions on Magnitsi with infection and added that Bulgarian institutions could not serve neither work with these people because they would be immediately excluded from the SWIFT system. In additions to the Ministry of Finance, however, the persons are almost double - 121.

There are 21 other physical and 33 legal entities with whom institutions and banks also refuse to work because they are ordered. Of the first from the working group established by Council Decision 441 and led by the Minister of Finance. And the latter - from the BNB. Which, instead of showing common sense, immediately following the decision of the Council of Ministers to commercial banks as well as dark guidelines with whom deprived of access to the banking system and companies. In the 21st century, in the European Union. Without a court without a conviction, only on the basis of administrative arbitrariness.

Why are these people inserted into the Bulgarian blacklist?
Because of data from US institutions? Absolutely not. OFAC has not submitted additional names outside those officially announced on 2 June.
Because of sentences? Again no. None of the persons in the additional list is inserted for investigation or verdict.
In fact, the only reason these 21 people and 33 companies already have over 2 months to have accounts and banks and administration refuse to serve it is that over the last 5 years have been in the management bodies of companies related to US lists. But the US has never put a time criterion when imposing sanctions. Ie The 5 years in question are an entirely Bulgarian patent.

According to Asen Vassilev, this was a "sanitary cordon to prevent the infection". Of course, such a statement is comic, because it is like amputing a hand for a broken finger. But the fact is that such explanations are just a screen for the grotesque truth. And she is that
The list actually acts as a bat in the hands of the office cabinet.

The persons in it are introduced entirely at the discretion of the working group headed by the official minister and far from covering everyone who could fall into it because of the 5-year limitation. For example, when publishing the so-called "Added list" lame that there does not appear the half of the Dubai Hasil Bozhkov - Elena Dineva. The lack is mysterious given the fact that Dineva besides his mate is also accused of participating in the prosecution by Bozhkov organized criminal group. But this lack is far from being the only one.

Equally enigmatically, a company disappeared, initially in it - the Greek "Intralot". Operating due to a technical error in the Commercial Register. But while "Intralot" was out of the list literally for the night, several dozen Bulgarian companies and people, part of the "finished list" continue to be deprived of their civil rights.

Despite the double standard of the working group, it must be no matter who is inside the list and who is outside, as the existence of any "blacklist" is an unprecedented administrative arbitrariness and in a European country. Articolences depriving civil rights dozens of European citizens, both sanctioned on master and supplemented in the Bulgarian lists. Not even because of the lack of justice. Because verdict is in the form of a definition of you from 5 June 2021

According to him, Decision No 441 of the Council of Ministers is an individual administrative act and, accordingly, if it is mentioned, its implementation. Only at the end of July the administrative cases formed by the BG list of Magnitsa against the Council of Ministers for Decision 441 and the Ministry of Finance and the BNB because of the blocking of accounts and refusal to service by institutions are over 54.

If the Yanev Cabinet was indeed led by the legality, as the Finance Minister Asen Vassilev was trying to make the supplementary list already in non-complaints. Instead, however, the persons in it continue to be guilty guilty, because not legality is leading for this cabinet. If it were, the official MS would not only comply with the decision of you, but would also be aware of the lack of case law.

But the government "Yanev" obviously has no interest in this. For if there was a clear regulation and laws, none of these regulatory, as a "sanitary cordon", for example, would not be able to happen. Neither Vassilev would be able to freak as a contamination as a democratic rule in this country. And at the first meeting of the Vassilev Parliamentary Committee, he lies in his attempts to justify the illegal actions of the office cabinet.

The Bulgarian lists were not implementing the Law Magnitsa, and what they were when in the very decision of the Council of Ministers, it was pointed out. And without any reason, the circle of sanctioned persons is expanded. The lists were "Sanitary Cordon" - Cordon about what and against what. Cordon covert only the obvious self-departments of the executive with the uncomfortable faces. Uncomfortable for private oligarchical interests.

that puts the question of what, or rather who is behind this arbitrary?
It is not difficult to guess - it is only enough to see the pioneering plum with which the capital editions "capital" defend the actions of the office cabinet and those of Minister Vassilev. In the reverse situation, if someone "them" was hit by the Bulgarian "blacklist", only imagine what the Voy would give "the media" of Ivo Prokopiev. They would be the gifiles on the television studios of his grant NGO guards, they would be human rights defenders to inflate us from morning to night, they would be alerts and complaints to the European institutions.

As they have already made it for decades for far smaller offenses of the authorities, allowing them to break the rights of a loose refugee, Roma or a convicted killer whom Soros's pack has recognized as an innocent "human rights activist". Only that they are silent now. We have no word, us, our moan, on the subject of violation of the rights of hundreds of individuals and legal entities.

The Proctaine Mainstream is silent, Asen Vassilev acts. So who is actually the bat and who is the man who keeps her in his hands to hits economically on the enemies of him, he becomes crystal clear.